3 ms·
I'd file it under affirmative action [1], which is not illegal in most countries/states (on the contrary). Lots of commenters here simply cite single paragraphs
by ThePhysicist 5y ago
I'd file it under affirmative action [1], which is not illegal in most countries/states (on the contrary). Lots of commenters here simply cite single paragraphs from anti-discrimination laws but what they don't understand is that the laws often allow organizations to correct bias by giving preferential treatment to underrepresented groups. The logic behind is that the majority group (e.g. white caucasian young males) might have bias to hire peers that they identify with, hence perpetuating their majority. Quota-based hiring / candidate selection is one way to solve this problem. Different jurisdictions have different rules though, in Germany hiring practice for certain professions (e.g. professorships) is that if two candidates are equally qualified but one is a woman then she will always receive preferential treatment (which is fair IMHO).
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_Unit...
- sydd 5y agoI'd file it as a violation of title VII of the civil rights act: "It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#Title_VII%E2%80%94equal_employment_opportunity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964#Title...
- xyzzyz 5y ago> Quota-based hiring / candidate selection is one way to solve this problem. Quota based hiring is explicitly illegal in the US (Gratz v. Bollinger)