7 ms·

For sure, but I bet not all kids with support from their family do cool things. Or put it in the other way, you have to prove yourself worthy before getting any

For sure, but I bet not all kids with support from their family do cool things. Or put it in the other way, you have to prove yourself worthy before getting any fund (even from parents).

JohnBooty 5y ago
Yeah, absolutely. I think the best way to understand this kid is that he is definitely at the intersection of privilege and talent. That is not to take anything away from his achievements. This kid's kicking ass.
- quickthrower2 5y ago
  The other factor is access to youtube to find likeminded people and have things explained and see what is possible. When I was young I loved computers but even install Linux or learn machine code seemed like this impenetrable world that was “for adults”. I think the modern internet is great for people sharing knowhow. That said this man is a genius!
  - 0xedd 5y ago
    Disagree. Didn't have YouTube, Google, etc and still cracked video game protections when i was 10.
    - quickthrower2 5y ago
      What were your resources to learn this?
      - bradlys 5y ago
        "Unzip rar file, copy, paste." Probably just used warez from torrents like everyone else did when they were that age.
    - JohnBooty 5y ago
      Nobody is saying that Youtube/Google/etc are necessary. Clearly people managed to do cool and clever things before those resources were available. It's beyond obvious, though, that having good resources is helpful and opens this kind of thing up to a larger number of participants.
- jeegsy 5y ago
  > That is not to take anything away from his achievements The entire purpose of mentioning his privilege at all is to take away from his achievements. Otherwise, why mention it. Surely it is obvious to all who read the article that you would have had to have access to capital to do what he did?
  - JohnBooty 5y ago
    If you want to believe my opinion is something other than the one I'm explicitly stating, that is a very strange decision. For the record: I'm not sure how much more clear I can be, but I do not feel that it takes away from his achievements whatsoever. I made my statement in reply to another poster who seemed to have the impression that this level of opportunity was the norm in America. That was the full extent of my "purpose."
sabhiram 5y ago
What this "kid" has done in his garage would still be impressive with more than modest support from the venture community.
bradlys 5y ago
> Or put it in the other way, you have to prove yourself worthy before getting any fund (even from parents). I really don’t know where you got this mindset but it’s 100% not true. I know many parents who throw many resources at their kids whenever their kids show even slight interest in something. Even if they don’t show interest in many things - they still get great access.
- 0xedd 5y ago
  An exception to prove the rule. Throwing money at a kid, unwarranted (slight interest makes it unwarranted), spoils the kid.

For sure, but I bet not all kids with support from their family do cool things. Or put it in the other way, you have to prove yourself worthy before getting any fund (even from parents).

JohnBooty 5y ago

Yeah, absolutely. I think the best way to understand this kid is that he is definitely at the intersection of privilege and talent. That is not to take anything away from his achievements. This kid's kicking ass.

quickthrower2 5y ago
The other factor is access to youtube to find likeminded people and have things explained and see what is possible. When I was young I loved computers but even install Linux or learn machine code seemed like this impenetrable world that was “for adults”. I think the modern internet is great for people sharing knowhow. That said this man is a genius!
- 0xedd 5y ago
  Disagree. Didn't have YouTube, Google, etc and still cracked video game protections when i was 10.
  - quickthrower2 5y ago
    What were your resources to learn this?
    - bradlys 5y ago
      "Unzip rar file, copy, paste." Probably just used warez from torrents like everyone else did when they were that age.
  - JohnBooty 5y ago
    Nobody is saying that Youtube/Google/etc are necessary. Clearly people managed to do cool and clever things before those resources were available. It's beyond obvious, though, that having good resources is helpful and opens this kind of thing up to a larger number of participants.
jeegsy 5y ago
> That is not to take anything away from his achievements The entire purpose of mentioning his privilege at all is to take away from his achievements. Otherwise, why mention it. Surely it is obvious to all who read the article that you would have had to have access to capital to do what he did?
- JohnBooty 5y ago
  If you want to believe my opinion is something other than the one I'm explicitly stating, that is a very strange decision. For the record: I'm not sure how much more clear I can be, but I do not feel that it takes away from his achievements whatsoever. I made my statement in reply to another poster who seemed to have the impression that this level of opportunity was the norm in America. That was the full extent of my "purpose."

sabhiram 5y ago

What this "kid" has done in his garage would still be impressive with more than modest support from the venture community.

bradlys 5y ago

> Or put it in the other way, you have to prove yourself worthy before getting any fund (even from parents). I really don’t know where you got this mindset but it’s 100% not true. I know many parents who throw many resources at their kids whenever their kids show even slight interest in something. Even if they don’t show interest in many things - they still get great access.

0xedd 5y ago
An exception to prove the rule. Throwing money at a kid, unwarranted (slight interest makes it unwarranted), spoils the kid.