3 ms·
>>So I can just simply say Microsoft has patents and therefore operating systems are not progressing because of that? You realize that's what you're claiming.
by syshum 5y ago
>>So I can just simply say Microsoft has patents and therefore operating systems are not progressing because of that? You realize that's what you're claiming.
In part yes... Look at the suppression of UNIX do to SCO.. I mean hell this is recorded history. I am honestly surprised I need to even debate this. SCO effectively killed Unix, and harmed Linux and BSD
Software patents have a long history of suppression innovation in software
>Your reality doesn't match mine. I work in the display industry.
This new age of dueling realities is a false. There is only one reality, and mine is based on recorded historical fact, your is based on personal experience and anecdote
Mine is actual reality, yours is a belief
>I'm not going to spend my time educating you repeatedly.
Nor am I
- robinsoh 5y ago> This new age of dueling realities is a false. There is only one reality, and mine is based on recorded historical fact, your is based on personal experience and anecdote I'm confused. What "recorded historical facts" were provided for this claim that E Ink is using patents to prevent progress in the display industry? > Mine is actual reality, yours is a belief Ok. Good for you then.