4 ms·
Just evaluate evidence and methodology. Historical factors are irrelevant. You obviously have a preconceived Truth that could never be disproven no matter what
by blindmute 5y ago
Just evaluate evidence and methodology. Historical factors are irrelevant. You obviously have a preconceived Truth that could never be disproven no matter what was empirically shown, but that's not science.
- wpietri 5y agoNah. I don't have The Truth, just some pretty good heuristics on how I spend my time. I've all ready looked into enough religion to know that I don't have to give any time to godbotherers. I've already looked at enough perpetual motion machines to know that I don't have to disprove each one. And I don't have to hear out each racist on why this time he's rilly rilly rite about how the people he hated all along are scientifically bad. Is it possible that one day somebody will come along with a real perpetual motion machine and I'll miss out for a while? Sure. But there are other people who enjoy evaluating that stuff enough that I'll eventually hear about it. And it's the same deal here. I don't get my theology from evangelical Christians, and I don't get my bioanthropology from evangelical racists.