You're twisting my words. My point is that we should judge this facility on the net emissions required to produce hydrogen, not how those emissions were caused/

You're twisting my words. My point is that we should judge this facility on the net emissions required to produce hydrogen, not how those emissions were caused/captured/offset. And once you've accounted for this, talking about the fact they're using carbon capture is marketing fluff; what matters is the overall footprint. This is akin to how "hybrid" cars are perceived. Being a hybrid doesn't make it any greener than a non-hybrid with the same fuel economy numbers.