> Their job is to say "this software is free, this software is not". But if they say "this software is free because the hardware is more locked down" then I do

> Their job is to say "this software is free, this software is not". But if they say "this software is free because the hardware is more locked down" then I don't see that as standing for user freedoms. > People constantly call on them to compromise It's about being more nuanced, not about making compromises.