You're using a lot of definite articles here: "the problem with Dynamicland", "the beauty of computers". I think this is a pretty crushingly middle-brow dismis

You're using a lot of definite articles here: "the problem with Dynamicland", "the beauty of computers". I think this is a pretty crushingly middle-brow dismissal of what is essentially a hugely ambitious tech demo that could evolve in thousands of ways and lead to all kinds of unforeseeable progress. I mean how does Dynamicland take away from the Internet? Is the status quo the global maximum? Frankly after 2 years of WFH, I'm far from convinced that staring at screens (whether traditional or in a VR headset) is the pinnacle of collaborative computing.