4 ms·
This is something we know to be true already. The more invasive, the more powerful the placebo effect. >Weirdly enough, surgery’s invasiveness may explain some
by tsol 5y ago
This is something we know to be true already. The more invasive, the more powerful the placebo effect.
>Weirdly enough, surgery’s invasiveness may explain some of its potency. Studies have shown that invasive procedures produce a stronger placebo effect than non-invasive ones, said researcher Jonas Bloch Thorlund of the University of Southern Denmark. A pill can provoke a placebo effect, but an injection produces an even stronger one. Cutting into someone appears to be more powerful still.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/surgery-is-one-hell-of-a-placebo/ https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/surgery-is-one-hell-of-...
- webmaven 5y agoHmm. What happens when patients are given general anesthesia and just told they've had invasive surgery? What if you supplement with a superficial incision and stitches, or a subdermal injection that causes some localized edema (and a dressing that obscures the fact there was no incision)?
- blumka 5y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sham_surgery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sham_surgery You can go further and actually do a pointless surgery.