4 ms·
SSGs are not "super easy" for non-devs. What's super easy is things like https://www.silex.me/ https://www.silex.me/ or, with more functionality, https://pinegr
by pmlnr 5y ago
SSGs are not "super easy" for non-devs. What's super easy is things like https://www.silex.me/ https://www.silex.me/ or, with more functionality, https://pinegrow.com/ https://pinegrow.com/
- lolinder 5y agoHugo or Jekyll should be super easy for anyone who's seriously considered hosting their own WordPress instance, like OP is. If setting up a static site generator is too difficult, they definitely shouldn't be running WordPress themselves.
- temp8964 5y agoThe easy Hugo or Jekyll setups do not match the features of WordPress. So they are not easy.
- jiggunjer 5y agoWhat features are the main considerations?
- sneak 5y agoDoing everything in a web browser without editing local files, mostly. "Open a text editor" or "git commit" are enough to put off people who don't think of themselves as computer people even though complexity wise they are no different than WP, simply because you gotta leave the browser.
- lolinder 5y agoNetlify CMS is pretty easy to set up and has all of the basic features that you need for a simple blog. And again, I would never recommend a static site generator to someone who doesn't think of themselves as a computer person. The context in which this conversation started was someone who was seriously considering hosting their own WordPress instance. I dearly hope that they think of themselves as a computer person.
- temp8964 5y agoI am a programmer, but I don't have patience to read through SSG documentation to setup a basic website.
- temp8964 5y agoLike setup categories and tags, themes, url structure, etc. without needing to read the documentation?
- lolinder 5y agoI'd count all of those in the "easy for developers" category, as long as you're willing to read documentation. It's 1-2 lines of config for any one of those, and the config in question is at the very front of the doc pages. If you're unwilling to read documentation, then yes, you're probably better off sticking to Squarespace or WordPress.com
- magicalhippo 5y agoIt's been a wee bit since I last looked, but for me I want these "out of the box": - Good support for posting source code from various languages, both inline and in blocks, with syntax highlighting. - Zero-effort image posting ala WordPress, ie with automatic down-sizing of the inline image if needed (in these days ideally multi-resolution). I imagined these were quite basic needs, but I've been disappointed each time I've gone looking. Been a year since last time though.
- lolinder 5y agoHugo, at least, has built-in syntax highlighting (both block and inline) and at a glance it looks like Jekyll does, too. Netlify CMS has zero-effort image posting (saves to your repo's static folder). I'll grant that it doesn't do automatic downsizing, though Netlify as a CDN does.
- viraptor 5y agoYou're assuming that the person running the instance and writing content is the same. There are WP instances backing up serious business where people who don't know what CMS even means successfully edit content every day.
- lolinder 5y agoContext matters. I recommended a static site generator to a very specific person. Here's the comment I initially replied to: > I have thought about moving my personal blog onto something that isn't someone else's service. But every time I think about running my own blog server, stories like this come along. So... yes. I was assuming that OP was going to both be the person running their personal blog and writing on it, and I was assuming that OP is pretty technically competent if they were seriously considering running their own blog server.
- john-doe 5y agohttps://getpublii.com/ https://getpublii.com/ comes to mind too.