4 ms·
Sorry, dumb question, but why fluid as opposed to modal? iPad users are used to browsing products modally and there don't seem to be any usability issues with i
by siglesias 15y ago
Sorry, dumb question, but why fluid as opposed to modal? iPad users are used to browsing products modally and there don't seem to be any usability issues with it: there is a clear navigation stack as well as full focus on the product pages.
You have a fascinating concept. Could you explain some of your thinking on why you think this particular paradigm is superior?
- derwildemomo 15y agonot a dumb question at all. first let me clarify that i don't oppose the modal model in any way – as you said, it works just fine. My motivation was to find out whether the fluid model a) also works and b) has any advantages, and if yes which ones. I didn't come to a conclusion so far, but I have observed some interesting stuff, both on the pro and con side: - Once understood, the interface makes navigation considerably faster - The individual space for content is necessarily smaller and - The individual content panes have to adjust to the constraint that their content can only adjust horizontally, as the vertical axis is reserved for the navigation. I am opposed to saying that modal is inferior or something like that, it always depends on the context, the use case. In this very special case, it might be a better solution, but in many others, it fails hard ( think, for example, mail ).