3 ms·
> a man in Alberta being ordered by the court to say specific things about vaccines Could you expand on this? It sounds even more outrageous than this case.
by jevoten 5y ago
> a man in Alberta being ordered by the court to say specific things about vaccines
Could you expand on this? It sounds even more outrageous than this case.
- amscanne 5y agoHere is the case: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/np-view-an-alberta-courts-wrongheaded-order-to-compel-anti-vaxxers-to-refute-their-own-opinions https://nationalpost.com/opinion/np-view-an-alberta-courts-w... I don’t have any sympathy towards this guy for his actions or his views, but it strikes me as over the line to have a court order that if they share any views on vaccines they must include a disclaimer that their thoughts “may not be held by medical experts and what the majority of medical experts are recommending regarding vaccination and physical distancing”. How on earth is it okay for a judge to get to “creative” like that, especially when it’s in violation of charter rights?