3 ms·
Because it's adversarial. Your choice to use one OS makes it more difficult, in a tiny way, for me to use a different OS. You will write software for that OS. Y
by dTal 5y ago
Because it's adversarial. Your choice to use one OS makes it more difficult, in a tiny way, for me to use a different OS. You will write software for that OS. You will convince others to use that OS. You will tell your boss to get computers with that OS installed, and then other people at your job will have to deal with it. And every developer on that OS is one that isn't using, writing software, fixing problems etc on my OS. It's political. It's zero-sum. And Microsoft knows that all too well, and that is precisely the reason why WSL exists.
- ChuckNorris89 5y ago>Because it's adversarial. Your choice to use one OS makes it more difficult, in a tiny way, for me to use a different OS. So I shouldn't be allowed to use a certain platform of my choice because you think this somehow impacts you? Based on your logic how about you stop consuming water, oxygen, real-estate and food because it's making it more difficult for me, in a tiny way, to get those items. >You will write software for that OS. You will convince others to use that OS. You will tell your boss to get computers with that OS installed Please stop making false claims about me. You don't know me buddy.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- dTal 5y agoNobody said you shouldn't be allowed. But it does impact other people, and those people are also allowed to comment on it, or even put social pressure on you. I'm not going to respond to the sentences you added after I posted this comment, because I don't think they add very much.