>That the government would help them enforce their exceptional control over their employees, They didn't get that. The injunction doesn't cover the employees

>That the government would help them enforce their exceptional control over their employees, They didn't get that. The injunction doesn't cover the employees at all, only the new employer, who either has to make someone available so the original place can continue in operation for a bit. So it seems like they're working at the new place with the new, higher wages and the old place is going to pay legal fees + whatever compensation to the new employer. Financially, they've only managed to screw themselves even with this injunction. I quoted the injunction text in another thread on this story, BTW, since the headline is flat out wrong.