4 ms·

Well, you should have 'judged relevance' that more carefully then, because your submitted title is factually wrong, by a long shot.

belter 5y ago
"Número de mortos por Covid em Portugal é o mais alto desde março. Terceiro dia com 40 mil novos casos" https://www.tsf.pt/portugal/sociedade/portugal-regista-40090-novos-casos-de-covid-e-mais-34-obitos-14491643.html https://www.tsf.pt/portugal/sociedade/portugal-regista-40090... You go and translate it in case you need it...
- bernulli 5y ago
  Just read my first post and that should tell you everything that was wrong with your title. Because you insist on your alternative fact that 303 is somehow less than 39, I think propaganda is the right interpretation of the spin you are trying to give this story.
  - belter 5y ago
    No. You are the one being disingenuous. The core issue here is the curve and the trend. You use one data point and ignore the trend of all the few months and the last few days.That goes to the core of relevance or not of the post. It could not be, more clear, from the diagram: "Novos Casos e Óbitos desde o início da pandemia" at the center of this article: https://www.cmjornal.pt/sociedade/detalhe/-43-mortos-e-58-131-infetados-por-covid-19-nas-ultimas-24-horas-em-portugal?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques https://www.cmjornal.pt/sociedade/detalhe/-43-mortos-e-58-13... It is such a notable event, that made the front pages of every single newspapers on the day of reference I provided. According to your argument, just propaganda...Maybe you could argue where do you see the elements of disinformation? The factual statement that Portugal is practically at 90% vaccination or ... The factual statement, another wave is popping up with thousands of cases ( fortunately this time, it seems, with less serious consequences)?
    - bernulli 5y ago
      43 is still much less than 303, according to the math I learned in school.

belter 5y ago

"Número de mortos por Covid em Portugal é o mais alto desde março. Terceiro dia com 40 mil novos casos" https://www.tsf.pt/portugal/sociedade/portugal-regista-40090-novos-casos-de-covid-e-mais-34-obitos-14491643.html https://www.tsf.pt/portugal/sociedade/portugal-regista-40090... You go and translate it in case you need it...

bernulli 5y ago
Just read my first post and that should tell you everything that was wrong with your title. Because you insist on your alternative fact that 303 is somehow less than 39, I think propaganda is the right interpretation of the spin you are trying to give this story.
- belter 5y ago
  No. You are the one being disingenuous. The core issue here is the curve and the trend. You use one data point and ignore the trend of all the few months and the last few days.That goes to the core of relevance or not of the post. It could not be, more clear, from the diagram: "Novos Casos e Óbitos desde o início da pandemia" at the center of this article: https://www.cmjornal.pt/sociedade/detalhe/-43-mortos-e-58-131-infetados-por-covid-19-nas-ultimas-24-horas-em-portugal?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques https://www.cmjornal.pt/sociedade/detalhe/-43-mortos-e-58-13... It is such a notable event, that made the front pages of every single newspapers on the day of reference I provided. According to your argument, just propaganda...Maybe you could argue where do you see the elements of disinformation? The factual statement that Portugal is practically at 90% vaccination or ... The factual statement, another wave is popping up with thousands of cases ( fortunately this time, it seems, with less serious consequences)?
  - bernulli 5y ago
    43 is still much less than 303, according to the math I learned in school.