3 ms·
If your language has a pattern grammar where one subset of numeric literals is valid as a pattern and another isn't, your parser is simply broken. There's no qu
by b3morales 5y ago
If your language has a pattern grammar where one subset of numeric literals is valid as a pattern and another isn't, your parser is simply broken. There's no question of prioritizing this or "real-world" use cases. It's a basic issue of does this work like any reasonable programmer would expect. The response there is nothing more than "you're holding it wrong"[0].
[0]:https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=You%27re%20Holding%20It%20Wrong https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=You%27re%20H...
- phlakaton 5y agoThe question is not whether it’s broken or a bad experience. Clearly it is. But software engineers KS stuff like that all the time. The question is: is the cost-benefit worth spending extremely limited resources to address? It is not hateful or dismissive to ask that question.