3 ms·
This is still very much true according to NOAA [0] A bit weird to make such a definitive statement about the, allegedly singular, culprit with "lawn runoff".
by freeflight 5y ago
This is still very much true according to NOAA [0]
A bit weird to make such a definitive statement about the, allegedly singular, culprit with "lawn runoff".
It's really difficult, to nearly impossible, to trace back where the nitrogen and phosphorus originated from that results in oceanic dead zones thousands of miles away [1].
A good start would simply be to look at the biggest consumers of these fertilizers, and those ain't homeowners fertilizing lawns, those are industrial scale agricultural operations [2] for whom fertilizer use directly correlates with their financial bottom line [3].
[0] https://oceantoday.noaa.gov/happenowdeadzone/ https://oceantoday.noaa.gov/happenowdeadzone/
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216153/
[2] https://www.epa.gov/agriculture/agriculture-nutrient-management-and-fertilizer#NutrientPollution https://www.epa.gov/agriculture/agriculture-nutrient-managem...
[3] https://investigatemidwest.org/2021/11/30/excess-fertilizer-washed-from-midwestern-fields-is-slowly-poisoning-the-gulf-of-mexico/ https://investigatemidwest.org/2021/11/30/excess-fertilizer-...
- ch4s3 5y agoI went back and revisited what I read and realized I was overstating the case on gains in fertilization efficiency. It's unfortunately too late to edit my original comment.