4 ms·
A lot of employers took emplyees for granted during the pandemic using that as an excuse to cut salaries while still taking home immense salaries themselves. Th
by windex 5y ago
A lot of employers took emplyees for granted during the pandemic using that as an excuse to cut salaries while still taking home immense salaries themselves. That's where it started. To add even more fuel to the fire in the tech enabled industries, the companies themselves reported great earnings.
- laurent92 5y agoThey also didn’t produce as good work as before the pandemic. The boredom of being home kills the creativity (Yes, I know, “not me”), the reduced communication killed collaboration effects (everyone became more siloed), and a lot of people got depressed. There is a reason why people pay more for butts-in-seats.
- joefife 5y agoI've found the complete opposite effect. Allowing people to work undisturbed has, for my team at least, allowed faster delivery of goals.
- kristopolous 5y agoNo they cut wages because the pandemic provided the excuse that permitted them to do so. They'd be terrible capitalists if they are paying people more then they had to. The wage difference is a function of power asymmetry, it's not the employer trying to do some kind of syndicalist wealth redistribution Many companies profits went up, yet they still slashed compensation. Well some of that profit was because they slashed.
- ramphastidae 5y agoIt’s no surprise that companies with broken cultures that value “butt in seats” struggled to adapt during the shift to remote work during pandemic. But that’s a problem with the companies, not remote work.
- ShamelessC 5y agoPeople quit because their bosses are like you - utterly tone-deaf and focused solely on output.