4 ms·
> You can make up whatever rationalizations The parent post is not "making up" rationalizations nor do I see an attempt to justify Soviet repression. The Sovi
by the_af 5y ago
> You can make up whatever rationalizations
The parent post is not "making up" rationalizations nor do I see an attempt to justify Soviet repression.
The Soviets were victims... earlier, during World War II, when their territory was razed to the ground and their people targeted for total racial extermination, and also faced the brunt of that war -- the most destructive war ever -- and did most of the blood shedding. That has to leave a permanent mark in the national psyche. A lot of what they did afterwards was making sure nobody and no country was ever in the position to do that to them, again. They definitely were creating buffer zones to protect their homeland, and I believe most modern analyses agree on this.
This doesn't make them saints. Yes, they were repressive and brutal to satellites they believed felt out of line. But it's not "making up rationalizations", it's what actually happened, and it does explain things.
Also,
> Not expansionist at all
Most powers were expansionist in some way or the other during World War II and its immediate aftermath.
- konart 5y ago>Most powers were expansionist in some way or the other during World War II and its immediate aftermath. Most powers are expansionists in some way at any point of time in history. I think a quote from "Seventeen Moments of Spring" is quite appropriate here. (the dialog is between a soviet spy and a german general while they are on a train. The war is almost over at this point): General: States are like people. Static makes them sick. Borders suffocate them. They need movement, this is an axiom. Movement is war. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T2s7WM4Uqk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T2s7WM4Uqk (no english subs)
- vba616 5y ago>The Soviets were victims... earlier, during World War II, when their territory was razed to the ground and their people targeted for total racial extermination World War II didn't start with the invasion of the Soviet Union, it started with Germany and the Soviet Union agreeing to dismember Poland, IIRC. And then somehow or other there was a bit of unpleasantness with Finland, wasn't there?
- aix1 5y agoFor those unfamiliar with the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pac... (esp. the Secret Protocol and the subsequent invasion of Poland).
- vba616 5y agoSomething I ran across while browsing related pages that I hadn't thought about, is the assertion that Germany got a huge amount of imported resources from the Soviets before they invaded that enabled them to engage in the devastating invasion, as well as carrying on the war with others.
- the_af 5y agoThe assertion is dubious. I mean, yes, Germany imported resources from the Soviet Union. No surprise there. Later, they also massively used Soviet slaves in order to fuel their war machine and factories. Without them, it would have been harder or impossible for Nazi Germany to continue the war. This is partly why they switched from "kill all Soviets on sight" to "extermination through labor".
- vba616 5y agoWhich is why the peaceful trading before the invasion miiiiiight have been a miscalculation by Stalin that led to millions of deaths. Germany invaded because they needed resources that they couldn't get elsewhere. Letting them bootstrap that into the invasion, among all of the mistakes that were made in WWII, seems like it might have been one of the top ones.
- the_af 5y agoEveryone made mistakes immediately before WW2. Some in the West even liked Hitler. Stalin sought support from the West and was denied; partially the reason for the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. The British also made mistakes, and let's not forget the French. None of this detracts from the fact the Soviet Union was ome of the biggest victims in WW2 and that they were traumatized by this.