6 ms·
When I was younger it was still fashionable to promote Slacktivism. I remember being a teenager buying a book of 101 things you can do to be More Green. But now
by _bfhp 5y ago
When I was younger it was still fashionable to promote Slacktivism. I remember being a teenager buying a book of 101 things you can do to be More Green. But now I think it's become more and more implied.
Between this and the first half I've read of Braiding Sweetgrass, I'm getting seriously irked by this massive focus on individual, very isolated choices as proxies for the world at large. It's fine for people to promote "old ways" of living but to cast it as exactly what we need for "the ecological society we’re trying to build" feels so wrong to me. We need organizers, movement leaders, direct actions, we need to shake the Democratic Party out of corruption and uselessness.
It's great to have a lifestyle--I agree with most of the values described in this post--but merely living it yourself does nothing for the human world or "ecology." A single animal rights activist stealing a chicken and getting flamboyantly arrested probably does more for climate change than this crew's work for their entire lives, because she moves the world a tiny bit closer toward giving up factory farming.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- nice_byte 5y agothe people behind this project are Canadian.
- kamranjon 5y agoI could not disagree more. I am inspired by people who live their principles and can smell a virtue signaling attention magnet from a mile away. I don’t think anyone has any responsibility to change the world, if people would actually stop trying so hard we might actually get somewhere. A couple who built a knowledge compendium on how they live and some fun games and software they wanted to share with the world is fine by me.