Yes, more or less my point. All things being unequal, the only way to assign numbers is to know X of Group 2 Jabs were exposed to and contracted vs Y of Group 3

Yes, more or less my point. All things being unequal, the only way to assign numbers is to know X of Group 2 Jabs were exposed to and contracted vs Y of Group 3 Jab were exposed to and contracted... As it is, it's less odds and more "on average." Sadly, we're still getting bad data and bad interpretation of that data two years into this. At this point, sad to say, it feels intentional. Two years is quite a bit of negligence.