3 ms·
Almost as easy as just, you know, creating a website. Obviously, the simplified example is simplified, but can you sketch a case where this would actually be us
by voyou 15y ago
Almost as easy as just, you know, creating a website. Obviously, the simplified example is simplified, but can you sketch a case where this would actually be useful? Or, even better, point to a site where it is actually in use?
EDIT: Just to clarify, what I'm wondering is, where would a single-page site that consists of pages of content (rather than an app) be useful?
- ByteMuse 15y agoThe single page aspect is mostly just for 'slickness' - content is displayed instantly, animations are used and the page only needs to be loaded once. It is becoming more popular among the web; many portfolio sites that I come across are on a single page. The portfolio, business card, resume, etc... type site is well suited for a single page since they are simple, slickness is fairly important and search engine rankings aren't as important. A side benefit of Pagify is that it DRYs up what would otherwise be duplicated elements in content sites with static HTML pages, i.e. header, navigation and footer - and without any serverside processing. That being said, a single page and this plugin in particular, certainly aren't the best option for all sites. The reason I made this was to make the development cost virtually the same for developing single page sites.
- jsilence 15y agoHad the same thought. Nice, but Y? Why not simply make one HTML page and a couple of anchors for navigation. That would yield a simple site without the need to code anything. -jsl