3 ms·
Honestly, it should be. AWS is much better at the dumb, commodity services like s3, ec2 and rds (that are actually pretty smart) than they are at something lik
by glogla 5y ago
Honestly, it should be.
AWS is much better at the dumb, commodity services like s3, ec2 and rds (that are actually pretty smart) than they are at something like redshift, sagemaker or similar.
- pm90 5y agoThey're "good enough" for most users that might not care about super high availability, devex etc. As long as its cheap and solves a business problem, it will win.
- dilyevsky 5y agoDefine “good”? They are pretty reliable and scalable (if you exclude ebs from this mix) but have considerable cost (especially on networking side)
- shepherdjerred 5y agoSome of their more complex/bespoke services are very good, like Lambda, CloudWatch, and DynamoDB. Quality declines steeply once you're off the beaten path.