2 ms·
Satellites are relatively cheap. Certainly cheaper than the right-of-way to run cables through every expensive heavily populated city in America for instance.
by JoeAltmaier 5y ago
Satellites are relatively cheap. Certainly cheaper than the right-of-way to run cables through every expensive heavily populated city in America for instance.
In fact, it would seem obvious that a LEO power station would make a lot of sense for the same reason. Earth-bound stations have the disadvantage of ~50% duty cycle due to a periodic eclipse phenomenon known as 'night'.