4 ms·

JMeter has literally hundreds more features than this. This tool (apart from the non-free licence) seems more similar to `ab` and the dozens other http benchmar

JMeter has literally hundreds more features than this. This tool (apart from the non-free licence) seems more similar to `ab` and the dozens other http benchmarking tools (like siege, wrk, httperf, and others I haven't tried), with an added basic GUI. The last time I used JMeter to load test a site, I simulated many users: each thread logged into the site with its own account, selected a course (it was a LMS, Learning Management System), then opened a quiz, randomly answered all the questions, etc. Various metrics and graphs (e.g. RPS, 1%-quantiles of latency...) were used to estimate the maximal capacity of the web site. I also had a JMeter plugin that extracted perf data from the HTML responses. JMeter is a complex beast, and I'm not fan of its XML config and Java/Beanshell scripts... but I don't see this as a replacement in any way.

shawnz 5y ago
Whatever eventually displaces JMeter has got to start somewhere.
- RandyRanderson 5y ago
  Can you even 'replace' an open-source soln with a closed-source one? If so, there are already many better "replacements" like loadrunner: https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/loadrunner-alternatives/ https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/loadrunner-alternatives/
- sciurus 5y ago
  I think extensible open-source load testing tools like https://k6.io https://k6.io and https://locust.io https://locust.io are already replacing JMeter.
  - exdsq 5y ago
    Yeah locust is great - used it for fairly complex loadtesting of a blockchain and enjoyed it. Gatling is another good one if you like Scala.
ohashi 5y ago
Have you tried k6 and if so, what do you think? I've found it pretty powerful and it's completely scriptable which opens the doors to a lot of opportunity to do complex tests.
guidedlight 5y ago
I can’t stand JMeter’s drag and drop test plan interface. Everything should be code. I actually prefer LoadRunner. But it’s way too expensive.
- rhl314 5y ago
  I am working on a scripting interface for Loadjitsu as well. You will be able to run tests using a small DSL very soon.
rhl314 5y ago
I agree JMeter is a great tool, it has tons of features. Will be gradualy adding more to Loadjitsu, one day I hope it can compete with JMeter

shawnz 5y ago

Whatever eventually displaces JMeter has got to start somewhere.

RandyRanderson 5y ago
Can you even 'replace' an open-source soln with a closed-source one? If so, there are already many better "replacements" like loadrunner: https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/loadrunner-alternatives/ https://www.softwaretestinghelp.com/loadrunner-alternatives/
sciurus 5y ago
I think extensible open-source load testing tools like https://k6.io https://k6.io and https://locust.io https://locust.io are already replacing JMeter.
- exdsq 5y ago
  Yeah locust is great - used it for fairly complex loadtesting of a blockchain and enjoyed it. Gatling is another good one if you like Scala.

ohashi 5y ago

Have you tried k6 and if so, what do you think? I've found it pretty powerful and it's completely scriptable which opens the doors to a lot of opportunity to do complex tests.

guidedlight 5y ago

I can’t stand JMeter’s drag and drop test plan interface. Everything should be code. I actually prefer LoadRunner. But it’s way too expensive.

rhl314 5y ago
I am working on a scripting interface for Loadjitsu as well. You will be able to run tests using a small DSL very soon.

rhl314 5y ago

I agree JMeter is a great tool, it has tons of features. Will be gradualy adding more to Loadjitsu, one day I hope it can compete with JMeter