3 ms·
What's your point though? The OP was demonstrating that constructing plurals based on the given pattern does not hold generally. If you're stuck on boxen, then
by chana_masala 5y ago
What's your point though? The OP was demonstrating that constructing plurals based on the given pattern does not hold generally. If you're stuck on boxen, then choose some others:
man -> men, pan -> ?
- 4cao 5y agoGreat example, much better than anything I came up with.