4 ms·
Considering that BMJ made an entire article objecting to FB fact checking BMJ for public audiences [0], I really have to disagree that the article was only mean
by srcreigh 5y ago
Considering that BMJ made an entire article objecting to FB fact checking BMJ for public audiences [0], I really have to disagree that the article was only meant for expert eyes.
Given that, a few disclaimers and limitations to help quell public misinterpretation is required. Not to do so is irresponsible.
[0]: https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o95 https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o95
- epgui 5y agoI really don't think the objection (and reasons for the objection) to the fact check (1) and the intended audience being largely composed of experts (2) are mutually exclusive.
- srcreigh 5y agoThere should be 0 problem with not being able to share publicly if it was not meant for public audiences. They really can only have one or the other. Experts can email each other.