I appreciate the honesty and the article, but it would have been just as interesting (and more authentic) if you would simply be honest: “How we got to $1mm AR

I appreciate the honesty and the article, but it would have been just as interesting (and more authentic) if you would simply be honest: “How we got to $1mm ARR with only a tiny seed round”. Reading an article and immediately recognizing inconsistencies is an instant turn-off for me, and I assume many other readers. I don’t see what you think you’re gaining by being misleading with the headline.