It think it is good that evidence was provided that the article is wrong on these points. It illustrates how easy it is to dupe people. Since the first unsubs

It think it is good that evidence was provided that the article is wrong on these points. It illustrates how easy it is to dupe people. Since the first unsubstantiated assertions were made in a magazine it now falls to those who claim it is wrong to do the work to prove it is wrong. The one first making the unsubstantiated assertion is at an advantage in that naysayers are now put in the position of proving they are right. This happens quite a but with news reporting. This is particularly true with political reporting. It’s much harder to combat the initial messaging than it is to make unsubstantiated charges. Those unsubstantiated assertions should not have been permitted in the article.