3 ms·
Rarely do I see a mention of Ultraedit. Although it is a paid software, it was nice and polished as expected. However, I have very limited experience with it. A
by kasperset 5y ago
Rarely do I see a mention of Ultraedit. Although it is a paid software, it was nice and polished as expected. However, I have very limited experience with it. Any thoughts?
- pjmlp 5y ago20 years ago it was everywhere on the offices I used to work on, it was quite good. No idea where it stands nowadays.
- Cwizard 5y agoIt is still the default text editor in our office
- ziml77 5y agoI tried it a couple years ago, but the only reason I saw to use it over other options is the support for loading massive files. Opening up a gigabyte+ log file is easy for it. But that's not all that compelling since I'm not looking to edit logs. I can use BareTail or similar programs for that.
- szszrk 5y agoOh my. I used to have a license at some previous work. I was able to read two 2GB text files and do a graphical diff on those, while using a 4GB laptop on Enterprise Windows Vista. That thing was polished as hell! But "never" versions broke a bit that experience. I found it horrible to work with proper syntax highlighting and modern things like that, though. At least back then.