2 ms·
win7 was aesthetically awful, but usability was almost on point but KDE is slightly better, at least in these aspects I care about, of course it looks disgusti
by zakius 5y ago
win7 was aesthetically awful, but usability was almost on point
but KDE is slightly better, at least in these aspects I care about, of course it looks disgusting, but you don't need third party tools to disable taskbar grouping and that's a big thing
- CRConrad 5y ago> win7 was aesthetically awful, but usability was almost on point A bunch of clicks to get to the Control Panel, but once there just a few to get to the GUI configuration dialogue box, and somewhere in that one or two more to enable "Windows Classic" style, and you had the good old W95/NT4/98/2K aesthetics back -- and all the functionality of W7. (And then you could spend a day or two getting colours and fonts and GUI-element sizes juuuust... so, if you wanted to.)
- systemvoltage 5y agoI agree, Windows 7 wasn't as good as Win95/98. Win95 I think is just second to none in UI design. Perhaps, Cinema4D UI is a contender but that's an application. If you haven't checked, totally checkout C4D :-).