4 ms·
Ermm...no. I would say Microsoft's UI team was absolutely stellar and basically the gold-standard in the world during Windows 95 days. I think you need to open
by systemvoltage 5y ago
Ermm...no.
I would say Microsoft's UI team was absolutely stellar and basically the gold-standard in the world during Windows 95 days.
I think you need to open your mind a little bit and read: https://socket3.wordpress.com/2018/02/03/designing-windows-95s-user-interface/ https://socket3.wordpress.com/2018/02/03/designing-windows-9...
This is debatable but personally, 2009 Windows 7 UX/UI is still better than 2022 versions of GNOME, KDE, XFCE what-have-you in the Linux world. If anything, complete opposite of what you're saying is true. Linux UX/UI is let's just politely put it - OK.
- zakius 5y agowin7 was aesthetically awful, but usability was almost on point but KDE is slightly better, at least in these aspects I care about, of course it looks disgusting, but you don't need third party tools to disable taskbar grouping and that's a big thing
- CRConrad 5y ago> win7 was aesthetically awful, but usability was almost on point A bunch of clicks to get to the Control Panel, but once there just a few to get to the GUI configuration dialogue box, and somewhere in that one or two more to enable "Windows Classic" style, and you had the good old W95/NT4/98/2K aesthetics back -- and all the functionality of W7. (And then you could spend a day or two getting colours and fonts and GUI-element sizes juuuust... so, if you wanted to.)
- systemvoltage 5y agoI agree, Windows 7 wasn't as good as Win95/98. Win95 I think is just second to none in UI design. Perhaps, Cinema4D UI is a contender but that's an application. If you haven't checked, totally checkout C4D :-).