4 ms·
What they're implying is that we should connect the dots. It's pretty obvious which demographic the bill is aimed at, despite its race-neutral language. The b
by vanusa 5y ago
What they're implying is that we should connect the dots.
It's pretty obvious which demographic the bill is aimed at, despite its race-neutral language.
The beauty of this legislation is that its net effect will be to stoke the "woke mob" even further by confirming their fantasies about white fragility. Thus further promoting divisiveness and distrust. Which is of course what they sides ultimately want.
- andriesm 5y agoReading between the lines to read race into a law where race is absent seems to me to be racism. The whole point of laws is, they should make sense when you reverse race or leave out race completely. And this is why critical race theory is cancer... its always one sided, victims are always darker and perpetrators are always lighter shades.