20 ms·
I don’t believe he erred for the sake of erring (I don’t think anyone does, finally), but I do think his errors were transparent at the time. See, for example,
by huetius 5y ago
I don’t believe he erred for the sake of erring (I don’t think anyone does, finally), but I do think his errors were transparent at the time. See, for example, the refutation in Suarez’ Against the Errors of the Anglican Sect, Book II.
- anigbrowl 5y agoFascinating though this looks I don't have the semester+ required to study it properly.