4 ms·
One thing I haven't seen is the "raw data" people being willing to pay for their own government certified consultants to anonymize the data. I presume this wou
by bsder 5y ago
One thing I haven't seen is the "raw data" people being willing to pay for their own government certified consultants to anonymize the data.
I presume this would actually be the solution if the "raw data" people were making good faith requests.
Is there any reason why this wouldn't be viable?
- macilacilove 5y agoThe public needs the data, so the public need to pay for it. We absolutely can. Yet the FDA says "sorry only 500 pages a month" which means 110 months.
- bsder 5y ago"The Public" also need our institutions to be Denial of Service resistant. As a number of sanctioned and disbarred lawyers have demonstrated, several groups in the US are quite happy to launch Denial of Service attacks against our institutions. The easiest way to solve this is "You get <X> pages per month. If you want more than that, bring FDA certified folks to handle the job and pay them from your own coffers." I don't see the people requesting the data to also be ponying up the money to get the data faster.