I am naive about the reality on the ground when it comes to this issue, but doesn't this hinge on transparency? If they can show they are covering costs + the

I am naive about the reality on the ground when it comes to this issue, but doesn't this hinge on transparency? If they can show they are covering costs + the going market rate, which seems to be 30% (at best), then wouldn't it be reasonable? So is a 45% cut for infra ok or not seems to be the question.