Many of the accusations in this allegedly science-based article are purely guilt by association. In many cases there's no association at all, just fringe people

Many of the accusations in this allegedly science-based article are purely guilt by association. In many cases there's no association at all, just fringe people referencing Doshi's peer-reviewed publications. If Hitler was against cigarettes, does that mean I should smoke? I can literally not find two consecutive sentences in this entire article without a snarky ad hominem or tribal flag-wave.