4 ms·
The counter theory is the comment that OP made. Your response opens with a denial of OPs theory; this response would be more effective with citations. Your theo
by appletrotter 5y ago
The counter theory is the comment that OP made. Your response opens with a denial of OPs theory; this response would be more effective with citations. Your theory makes sense, but I just don't see why it has to be mutually exclusive. Maybe they're both factors to varying degrees?
- vmception 5y agosure, I can accept a multipronged explanation, I already acknowledged that both of our observations are related to the food supply issues chronic on that continent, I don't think their specific correlation has been studied though so there's nothing to really say. My hypothesis is that my observations (which have been studied and are actively being addressed by many organizations) are going to have a greater weight by mere deduction: there is nothing unique enough about people in Africa that would make cancer appear earlier, and since they die earlier there and have worse preventative treatment to know other upcoming ailments, the cancer wouldn't come up because they're already dead from other basic infrastructure issues. What I'm reading is "hey here is this ailment people get in their 60s, here's this continent where people barely survive until their 60s, do you have a citation for why people there don't frequently get that ailment there? we should really study that"