3 ms·
Law isn't interpreted by computers, it is interpreted by human judges, who generally aren't impressed by such hacks (though you might get lucky).
by kentonv 5y ago
Law isn't interpreted by computers, it is interpreted by human judges, who generally aren't impressed by such hacks (though you might get lucky).
- dragonwriter 5y agoYeah, when the law allows additional sanction for willful/knowing violation, courts will not only often see through your “clever hack”, but also see it as evidence of deliberate wrongdoing.
- shawnz 5y agoAren't the seats themselves already a "hack"?
- vba616 5y agoAlso see: structuring. You have to report behavior X, and if you deliberately don't do behavior X to avoid reporting it, that's a crime too! Let's see you put that on the blockchain...
- colejohnson66 5y agoSee also: the $10k reporting threshold for banks. Deliberately doing smaller transfers to avoid the reporting threshold can be illegal (depending on intent), and the banks are legally mandated to report suspicious activity (such as that) as well.
- vba616 5y agoThat is what I meant.