3 ms·
I'm going to go against the grain of the comments so far: (1) the title on HN is misstated / way too lofty but there is some [non-technical] substance here, (2)
by tedmiston 5y ago
I'm going to go against the grain of the comments so far: (1) the title on HN is misstated / way too lofty but there is some [non-technical] substance here, (2) the title on HN says "CTO" while this person's title in the article is "Partner & Head of IT", (3) "Profound" is nowhere to be found in the title or article itself.
A more fitting title for HN might be: Some zen-inspired reflections on 2021 from a leader of an incubator / agency.
That said, I think the post could have benefitted from editing. It's a bit stuff and wordy... and could have probably communicated the same info more effectively at ~1/3 of its current length.
- itsdrewmiller 5y agoYou're supposed to use the actual article title on HN unless there is a good reason you can't. I agree with everything else about your take.