The argument that non-competes increases hiring is like saying debt slavery increases credit. Probably true but society pays for it in the end. That said inste

The argument that non-competes increases hiring is like saying debt slavery increases credit. Probably true but society pays for it in the end. That said instead of outlawing the practice the law should demand sevetance based on salary for each month of non-compete. Even 50% is probably enough to quench interest for it in junior positions.