--jp doesn't even make sense as it's an abbreviation.. it's rather be --json-part. The notation seems to be similar to HAML<>HTML. It's not JSON, and it doesn'

--jp doesn't even make sense as it's an abbreviation.. it's rather be --json-part. The notation seems to be similar to HAML<>HTML. It's not JSON, and it doesn't make any sense other than really short ad hoc queries. It's just confusing and only solves a problem that a tiiiny amount of people have (regualar ad hoc json queries, where people are too lazy to actually write out json). Otherwise, why not do the same for XML, css. Or heck.. why not simply support HAML as well It's better to have such functionality extracted in some other tool and just pipe it