3 ms·
Probably worse, because at least there’s well established tooling for reverse engineering Windows binary drivers, allowing for someone to eventually write FOSS
by kitsunesoba 5y ago
Probably worse, because at least there’s well established tooling for reverse engineering Windows binary drivers, allowing for someone to eventually write FOSS drivers.
- RReverser 5y agoI don't think it's worse because: 1) Wasm was designed to be easily decompilable / convertible to a text assembly representation by design, whereas for other platforms it requires fairly sophisticated disassemblers 2) Wasm can interact with the outside world (any I/O) only via explicitly defined import points, which are easy to intercept and/or replicate even if you don't know what's inside the binary itself.