5 ms·
Indeed, seems like the IBM "fiasco" with PCs looms large here. The dominance of clones was awesome for consumers, not so much for IBM.
by marktangotango 5y ago
Indeed, seems like the IBM "fiasco" with PCs looms large here. The dominance of clones was awesome for consumers, not so much for IBM.
- b112 5y ago[flagged]
- someguydave 5y agoThe IBM (also Apple) clone fiasco looms large over every sector of electronics. Nobody seems interested in investing in manufacturing electronic hardware without some prospect of customer lock-in.
- bluGill 5y ago> The dominance of clones was awesome for consumers, not so much for IBM. Are you sure? it is really hard to predict what would have happened. Without the clones would the Apple II have taken off (it did have clones, but they would have needed to come up with a 16/32 bit upgrade pretty soon - the IIgs comes to mind though it was too late) , or maybe the mac? Sure IBM had a name and would have got some sales, but would the platform take off? IBM did make a ton of money on PCs even if they were a bit player overall. We can never know the above.