4 ms·
In my adult life, I have seen two small niches completely explode the instant the underlying patents expired: mechanical keyboards and 3D-printing. In the forme
by nisegami 5y ago
In my adult life, I have seen two small niches completely explode the instant the underlying patents expired: mechanical keyboards and 3D-printing. In the former, companies like Kailh started off producing copies of existing Cherry designs, but they've since expanded to their own original designs which in my opinion are vastly superior. At the same time, the original Cherry design's monopoly allowed the community to center on their shape and mounting mechanisms as a standard (despite the fact that they're not great and can be improved). If it were a free-for-all, I feel like there would be a lot less consensus on the form factor.
I think the world has outgrown our current approach to IP, but as long as it continues to suit the needs of those who already hold resources, nothing will change.
- tabtab 5y agoHardware patents seem to make more sense than software patents. Words and diagrams are more constrained in possible interpretations with physical things. Software terms can be interpreted too damned many ways, making it an expensive lawyer war. In my opinion we should either do away with software patents, or make sure they are interpreted in a sufficiently narrow way, and are clearly "not obvious". Further, "business processes" didn't used to be patentable, and that's the way it should be.