You want redundancy in the system, you have to pay the piper. What is the point for me to run a redundant but operationally more expensive system than my compet

You want redundancy in the system, you have to pay the piper. What is the point for me to run a redundant but operationally more expensive system than my competition - when at the time my redundant infra is the only option, I do not get to cash out. You can see as whatever way you want, but Price is signal and it is better overall for the system to let Price to spike to certain insane levels. Should there be some kind of common-sense regulation for curtailing bad behavior perhaps. If you need people or companies to build in redundancy - you have to pay the price or just run the efficient but fragile system and enjoy the black outs.