3 ms·
Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Some environments simply can't live with that risk.
by gtirloni 5y ago
Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Some environments simply can't live with that risk.
- csdreamer7 5y agoIf an org has that kind of risk, shouldn't they be paying for their OS?
- gilrain 5y agoCentOS Stream is just a hair’s breadth from as stable as CentOS ever was… anyone who wants to quibble with the size of the hair should just buy RHEL.
- cue_the_strings 5y agoCentOS Stream's last podman major version update broke 70% of my company's infrastructure, affecting 120+ employees and our customers. It was a bug that couldn't be fixed without reverting the version, but we had to revert the whole update because all kinds of dependencies also got updated. We switched to Rocky the next day, on all VMs, and haven't had trouble since. We never had trouble with the original Centos (7 and 8).
- gilrain 5y ago70% of your company’s infrastructure and the productivity of 120+ people relied on a server OS without so much as a support contract? Seems risky, indeed.
- Conan_Kudo 5y agoYou're going to have this problem with the next EL point release anyway, because the only thing CentOS Stream does is give it to you earlier...