4 ms·
My apologies, I think in phrased that poorly. The parent comment I replied to stated: >Steps doesn't seem to be a bad measurement as it naturally partially co
by netizen-936824 5y ago
My apologies, I think in phrased that poorly.
The parent comment I replied to stated:
>Steps doesn't seem to be a bad measurement as it naturally partially controls for height
My question is why would height matter at all in this context if it were not controlled for? Is height associated with mortality?
- Tenoke 5y agoHeight is associated with a lot of things including mortality, yes. But more importantly, as mentioned other easy to measure metrics like distance would ignore that it takes different levels of exertion (due to different height and stride length) to cover a given distance while steps accounts for that to a larger extent.
- netizen-936824 5y agoSo following this rationale, wouldn't steps naturally be different with different exertion with different heights? Doesn't seem like it really controls for height from my perspective