I just realized that my original post didnt address what your wrote. Its retained below the line for posterity First family corruption isn't something of “the

I just realized that my original post didnt address what your wrote. Its retained below the line for posterity First family corruption isn't something of “the last half decade”, implying Trump. Its goes back way further and American don’t like, want it gone and whenever evidence of it appears they want heads to roll. Second, if we’re comparing to the last half decade, then it stands to reason that prosecutors should be sicced on the first family as the Trump family was. Fair is fair, afterall. _____________ If you accept that the laptop is not a fake (a point that was conceded by traditional media after the election), the laptop contains substantial evidence [1] of corruption and sale of access. Furthermore it contains evidence that the president knew about it and was the coordinator behind the scenes (including Hunter complaining that his dad was taking too large a cut). Now, before we get too excited, I think what’s on the laptop is par for the course in DC for either party. Its just the Joe has the fortune [2] of having a particularly inept son. [1] I use the word “evidence” on purpose, as opposed to the word “proof”, that is to say it contains pieces of evidence that has to be validated, contextualized, etc. For example, are the ppl that have come forward claiming that a certain nickname refers to Joe Biden lying? The laptop is real, this much is widely conceded, but were the material published on right wing media really on it, or are they a fabrication? Or are they cut outs out of context? But, prima facie, it doesn’t look good. [2] I originally wrote “misfortune”, but no child is unfortunate. I really didnt know how to write this sentence in a way that A. Conveyed my belief that Joe’s son causes problems B. Joe’s son is a blessing for Joe and his family EDIT: grammer