3 ms·
There's not really magic with s3, you still need to name things with coherrent prefixes to spread around the load. DynamoDB is almost simple enough to learn in
by gonzo41 5y ago
There's not really magic with s3, you still need to name things with coherrent prefixes to spread around the load.
DynamoDB is almost simple enough to learn in a day. And if you're doing nothing with it, you're only really paying for storage. Good luck with your decisions.
- jopsen 5y agoAnd S3 won't scale instantly... If your load is big enough :) Everything has limits, but S3 is remarkably hard to break if used right.
- PaywallBuster 5y agoPrefixes are not needed 90% of use cases
- brodouevencode 5y agoI'm not going to speculate on the accuracy of 90% value, but I will say that appropriately prefixed objects substantially help with performance when you have tons of small-ish files. Maybe most orgs don't have that need but in operational realms doing this with your logs make the response faster.
- ralusek 5y agoS3 naming no longer matters for performance. Rejoice.