> We are not opposed to end-to-end encryption, as long as it is implemented in a way that does not put children at risk. Holy moley. Even if that were possibl

> We are not opposed to end-to-end encryption, as long as it is implemented in a way that does not put children at risk. Holy moley. Even if that were possible, do they think child groomers will have an issue using an "illegal" E2EE service?